Facebook_pixel
SimplePhysics

SimplePhysics

Jundroo, LLC

4.0 Ratings 9K+ Reviews

Ratings & Reviews

Write a Review
  • Great game, challenging puzzles Apr 18, 2019

    By jms2k
    I’ve played this game since the initial release. My daughter plays it quite a bit now, too. Always trying to beat my scores. The leaderboards seem to be gone, now, though. Would love to see more levels added (even if it was a paid add-on)!
  • Great Dec 28, 2017

    By Carson21056144328567001
    It’s very good. Only problem with it is that there are not enough levels
  • Makes you think Mar 13, 2019

    By 62 Buick
    Find me a game that makes you think. Finally a game that makes you use your brain. It’s unlike those mindless games that are good if you only have two brain cells left.
  • Great game Sep 2, 2018

    By Hvac1
    Have the game through 3 phones now. Love it! Great way to kill time, think of new designs. I now have my kids trying to play & think of ways how to build structures.
  • Really fun Sep 27, 2019

    By Unubhgvgvtvtvcrxrvh
    Come on! Come out with more already! You’ve waited so long, I assume if & when you do come out with more, you’ll come out with 100 levels!
  • Decent Sep 15, 2018

    By Chuparcabra
    This game is good, and makes you think hard. However, for a paid game, I feel like there should’ve been 2-3 more levels. Also, clues or tips should be at least a in game, attainable things that you can reuse by achieving *insert parameter*.
  • Why doesn’t my app for SIMPLE PHYSICS open anymore? Feb 11, 2021

    By iSparki
    Love this app. Grandkids now love it too. But. It doesn’t open anymore. I have an iPhone 10max. Is it a comparability issue? Thank you.
  • Long live the truss May 18, 2021

    By Eupnic
    A challenging game that makes you think of interior structure when buildings are seen in the real world
  • Great training Oct 16, 2020

    By Gernob
    Great way to see your design work and distribution of load for school project
  • Engaging Oct 26, 2020

    By ah j he see
    My 10 year old grandson loves this game. He spends hours trying to get more stars!
  • Great game, challenging puzzles Apr 18, 2019

    By jms2k
    I’ve played this game since the initial release. My daughter plays it quite a bit now, too. Always trying to beat my scores. The leaderboards seem to be gone, now, though. Would love to see more levels added (even if it was a paid add-on)!
  • Great Dec 28, 2017

    By Carson21056144328567001
    It’s very good. Only problem with it is that there are not enough levels
  • Makes you think Mar 13, 2019

    By 62 Buick
    Find me a game that makes you think. Finally a game that makes you use your brain. It’s unlike those mindless games that are good if you only have two brain cells left.
  • Great game Sep 2, 2018

    By Hvac1
    Have the game through 3 phones now. Love it! Great way to kill time, think of new designs. I now have my kids trying to play & think of ways how to build structures.
  • Really fun Sep 27, 2019

    By Unubhgvgvtvtvcrxrvh
    Come on! Come out with more already! You’ve waited so long, I assume if & when you do come out with more, you’ll come out with 100 levels!
  • Decent Sep 15, 2018

    By Chuparcabra
    This game is good, and makes you think hard. However, for a paid game, I feel like there should’ve been 2-3 more levels. Also, clues or tips should be at least a in game, attainable things that you can reuse by achieving *insert parameter*.
  • Why doesn’t my app for SIMPLE PHYSICS open anymore? Feb 11, 2021

    By iSparki
    Love this app. Grandkids now love it too. But. It doesn’t open anymore. I have an iPhone 10max. Is it a comparability issue? Thank you.
  • Long live the truss May 18, 2021

    By Eupnic
    A challenging game that makes you think of interior structure when buildings are seen in the real world
  • Great training Oct 16, 2020

    By Gernob
    Great way to see your design work and distribution of load for school project
  • Engaging Oct 26, 2020

    By ah j he see
    My 10 year old grandson loves this game. He spends hours trying to get more stars!
  • Stopped Working Nov 24, 2020

    By Anencephalic
    I have enjoyed this app for years, but now I am running iPadOS 14.2 and whenever I start it, it immediately crashes. Please fix?
  • False advertising Nov 22, 2019

    By in the moment
    No indication that cost will be involved until you get well into the game. Be truthfull!
  • I want a refund now Jul 20, 2019

    By *ugghg ,mndsihfbeojjhisdbfoin
    I didn’t like this game and I want a refund
  • Boring Apr 4, 2019

    By help connie please
    I got the game with MY MONEY and I have already done all the lessons so it was a WASTE
  • IPhone not the interface to use Jun 18, 2013

    By Laron Von Baron
    Simply frustrating, maybe they should have stuck with the ipad,, the layout crowds out all usable space and unless you have fingers the size of drink stir stick forget this app for your phone really i cant see getting this for my iPad because it needs some work ALSO I am very dubious of apps that have to many 5 star ratings and lots of 1and 2 star ratings and very few 3,4 it is a sure sign of stacking the deck one person said it was the best game they ever played and then gave it a 3 star rating ?????? Sorry guys the truth is a habit with me game is based on fantasy and random solutions not engineered based reality
  • Absolutely Impossible Aug 25, 2011

    By Shell29
    -5 stars. This game is called 'Simple Physics' but the physics engine in this game is for , minus the smile. I can't even get past the second level! Four 50 lb. children could've totally fit on like four of my inventions. And the fact that you have to build stuff for as little money as possible adds a new level of the in- prefix. Btw, who the h*** builds a tree house on the side of the tree, 15 feet from the ground!?!?! I like physics games, and I have like, 9 of them on my iPhone but this is a sorry, worthless, excuse for a physics game. The physics wouldn't even make sense if you were on Jupiter. Free is to expensive for this app.
  • Flawed Physics Sep 17, 2011

    By proxli
    The game was fun, but then it crashed. I suppose the work around is to email myself each solution so the next time it crashes so I can reinstall and the get the 3 stars back. The BIGGER problem is that some constructions work in the sped up mode that do not work in the normal speed mode. ****Don't read further if you don't want to know a solution.*** For example, in the Windy City level make an upside down "W" (ie "M" but slanted ends) four units high at the bottom with a 2x1 triangle on top: fails in normal speed yet works in fast-forward speed. So the engine is flawed.
  • I bought the solution and feel cheated Jun 4, 2011

    By Antiecm
    I bought the solution and it solved the puzzles, but with junk solves. Take the first tree house. Any fool can solve it for 167 dollars. But go to the Leaderboard section and see that the top people are solving it for 28 dollars. Thats what I wanted to see, how did they solve it so cheap. But after buying the solve, I get a junk solve where anyone can do better. Solving the puzzles is not the issue. Solving them for the leader scores is as I do not believe they can actually be solved for that small amount.

No reviews available

No reviews available

  • Great game, challenging puzzles Apr 18, 2019

    By jms2k
    I’ve played this game since the initial release. My daughter plays it quite a bit now, too. Always trying to beat my scores. The leaderboards seem to be gone, now, though. Would love to see more levels added (even if it was a paid add-on)!
  • Makes you think Mar 13, 2019

    By 62 Buick
    Find me a game that makes you think. Finally a game that makes you use your brain. It’s unlike those mindless games that are good if you only have two brain cells left.
  • Great game Sep 2, 2018

    By Hvac1
    Have the game through 3 phones now. Love it! Great way to kill time, think of new designs. I now have my kids trying to play & think of ways how to build structures.
  • Really fun Sep 27, 2019

    By Unubhgvgvtvtvcrxrvh
    Come on! Come out with more already! You’ve waited so long, I assume if & when you do come out with more, you’ll come out with 100 levels!
  • Why doesn’t my app for SIMPLE PHYSICS open anymore? Feb 11, 2021

    By iSparki
    Love this app. Grandkids now love it too. But. It doesn’t open anymore. I have an iPhone 10max. Is it a comparability issue? Thank you.
  • Long live the truss May 18, 2021

    By Eupnic
    A challenging game that makes you think of interior structure when buildings are seen in the real world
  • Great training Oct 16, 2020

    By Gernob
    Great way to see your design work and distribution of load for school project
  • Engaging Oct 26, 2020

    By ah j he see
    My 10 year old grandson loves this game. He spends hours trying to get more stars!
  • Vary good. Jul 4, 2018

    By Muscle madness
    I got the app and soon after my dad got addicted to SimplePhysics he and I try to get the cheapest structure it’s so much fun. GET THE APP
  • Great app Oct 5, 2018

    By Mcrider2
    I am a Civil Engineer and love structural challenges. This app will test you and it works good.
  • Great Dec 28, 2017

    By Carson21056144328567001
    It’s very good. Only problem with it is that there are not enough levels
  • Great app Nov 9, 2011

    By 1drew30
    This is by far one of the best apps on the app store. There are endless possibilities on each level and so many different ways of approaching them. The only problem is there arent enough levels. Ten levels or whatever number it is, isnt enough to play for endless hours. I suggest that you add different level packs: such as carnival, which is all about amusement park rides; or winter, which is all about supports being weighted down by snow. Another cool feature to add to the app would be the material you are building with. For example, wood is weaker then concrete, but is less expensive. There are so many opportunities to make this app so much better, and you could easily do so by listening to your reviews. The people bring up good points.
  • VERY GOOD Sep 5, 2011

    By leo8750873
    This is the game that i ever looked for! I always wanted to be a architect. But the costs need to be more realistic. In the stairs level it says that the design must cost a maximum of 110 dollars but in real life its much more than that! And there should be a sandbox mode. Do that and i will give it 5 stars!(i never rate a game 5 stars) I like that the weak parts are red to show you that it needs tweaking. Also, in the finger test if you press "stop" then "no" the game will be stopped, then place various explosions then press play and see the big "boom"! its good to see if your design is very resistant. i dont know if its a bug, but if its a bug then dont fix it!
  • Good Apr 27, 2011

    By FrankieRox
    I really like it, and I enjoy how active the developer is (I think we just received the fourth update or something) so far I've beaten all the levels, and I think the dam was too easy. Id like to see the updates coming, perhaps you could include some support structures for boats, pickup trucks or other vehicles. I'd also like to see a sewer or maybe a dam that holds back two rivers where they connect. I'd really really really like to see a moon base mission, although you'll have to figure out what it is that the base needs to hold up. Thanks for making a great game that everyone should own - pleas just keep the updates coming!
  • Great build-it physics game! Aug 22, 2011

    By Sinner_D
    This game was great, limited on levels and a few other minor functionality issues was the only issues I saw fit to be corrected in this game. Aside from that this was an extremely fun build-it game that quickily became an extremely hard app that shows me I know not how to build a tornado proof skyscraper...lol I would greatly enjoy seeing more levels, and maybe a revamped physics engine including more complex structural physics, maybe a material selection function(just don't see any bomb shelter made of wood surviving) also while I was disappointed to not see the traditional bridge structuring, I greatly enjoyed the spin on it with all the different structures to build. Key Fixes: Selection then delete function - plenty of times I deleted wrong beam trying to delete another nearby beam. Revamp the scroll/zoom func. - double finger scrolling just doesn't feel right. More Levels - uhh self explainitory. Thanks for the great game so far!
  • Well designed Sep 5, 2011

    By Mhriberts007
    This is a great and engaging game, and unlike many others, it is not mindless. Definitely needs more levels, though. Only reason I gave it 4 stars is because it isn't super consistent. This is especially noticeable on the bomb shelter level where a solution will work one time, then you modify it, then go back to the way it was before, it suddenly fails. Other than that, great game. It's really fun to see just how cheap you can make them and still have them surivive
  • Brilliant!!! Aug 30, 2011

    By picky music critic
    Love the game. Really makes a person think. UI is very friendly. LOVE IT!!!!! And you need to love it too! The app is very stable, except, for me, when my battery died while running the app, the app crashed every time I tried to run it after recharging. I had to reinstall the app. Other than that, it NEVER CRASHED. And about the battery. This app seems to shorten 2nd gen iPod touch battery life very significantly. Play the game, but you'll know if you got carried away.
  • Great puzzle game! Jul 9, 2011

    By AngeloStAngelo
    If there were explanations or hints as to why a particular design worked better than others or if there was a way to view winning designs from the leader boards, it would be very helpful and more engaging game. Other than that, this game is only missing more levels. I think the "testing" interface could be more streamlined, but that is only a minor gripe. This is a great game that is well worth your time and money!
  • Great game! Nov 6, 2012

    By jmmaup
    First of all, great game. It left me wanting more levels. I'd like to think I'm learning physics principles while playing but I'm not so sure. I love the overlay where you can see where the stress is. It would be cool to be able to use different materials. Also, the interface feels a little clumsy, particularly with regard to the "erase" mode. That said, it's still more enjoyable than other physics builders I've played.
  • Awesome, except controls Dec 29, 2011

    By mittortz2
    Such a great game, I've been spending hours on this one (first levels are easy but it gets tough!) highly recommended. However, for steer reason the touch sensitivity is terrible. It never knows when you're pressing an in-game button, and it always gets where you want to draw a plank wrong. The only flaw I would like to see fixed. Oh and more levels please!
  • Decent Sep 15, 2018

    By Chuparcabra
    This game is good, and makes you think hard. However, for a paid game, I feel like there should’ve been 2-3 more levels. Also, clues or tips should be at least a in game, attainable things that you can reuse by achieving *insert parameter*.
  • Good. Needs more levels, better Ui. Apr 1, 2012

    By JeffJag
    It's a very fun game and I enjoy the challenge to build well while under budget. I would appreciate a lot more levels and different material options for added complexity and realism. Maybe the ability to just strengthen certain joints as well instead of single strengths across the board. A finer grid would add difficulty levels and allow for more arch-like shapes that would be stronger construction with less material. that's how real engineers do it. The simplicity of the game is nice but that doesn't mean it should be a limiting factor. I would appreciate a bit more polish and attention to the user interface. Deleting and building should have separate buttons or show some kind of indication of which tool is selected. Even a rocker switch would make more sense than a button that changes icons... Or the screen Ui could turn colors to indicate you're in erase mode. Either way it's currently shoddy Ui design. I'll rate this title higher if my improvements are made.
  • Enjoying the game BUT... Feb 8, 2013

    By CyberSpider2012
    This game doesn't include tutorials on basic engineering and architectural principles, leaving the player to flounder through experiment after experiment until something works. OK, the structure fails, but WHY is it failing? OK, a skyscraper should be flexible against elementary forces, but how do you build that? The budgetary limitation is an excellent aspect, but there are no tutorials on how to keep costs down other than to use less material. Lastly, the screen needs some work. Objects are too close to the edge. I frequent pull up the message board. You sometimes can't see what you're doing because your own finger is in the way. If you construct something incorrectly, you end up undoing it and trying again - and usually with the same results.
  • New update is not for my liking Apr 13, 2012

    By NunzioCorbb
    Before the most recent update ( the one adding the ramp and train bridge levels ) the menu navigating through everything (go back to menu, clear level , load levels, high scores, etc) has changed. I really don't like the new layout and where the buttons were located; and I highly prefer the old one. Also now when hitting the stop button in a finger level, it goes completely back to the blueprint instead of in the old version before the update, hitting the stop button would only freeze your current destruction. Please change back to old ways.
  • Fun, but... Aug 30, 2011

    By Jaguar187
    I was a big fan of bridge basher, and excited when I was able to get this one for free (yes, it was free, why complain?). Two things about this one bug me a bit: 1) working with smaller blueprints make for very frequent mistakes in the building phase (at least fir those of us with big fingers), 2) and when running the certification, other than the stair test, it's hard to see where a design is failing. In bridgebasher you could see where the stresses were happening, and make the necessary adjustments. In this game though, structures just fail completely without much insight as to why.
  • Great potential but falls short Sep 9, 2013

    By Phil200000000
    This game is really cool. And well the idea behind it is excellent. Also the features are not bad. With that said the physics could probably be better, or at least more consistent. Some designs I have made work once but on a second or third try fail and then miraculously work again. Also there are only a few levels. There could be more. Finally the game will sometimes crash on me. Not often but it has happened several times. All in all the game is pretty good but could be better.
  • Just ok. 11¢ a level. Jun 16, 2011

    By Axominster
    With only 9 levels & iffy touch controls this game doesn't hold up to it's 99¢ sticker price. And I never thought I'd say that about a decent game. Def needs more levels and you'll be finding yourself erasing as much as you're adding. Also I think you'd need a engineer's license to complete a couple of these levels. Did I mention there's only 9? That's 11 cents a level. Oh yeah and as an in-app purchase you can donate $5 to the developer. And for 99¢ you can get solutions to all the levels. All 9 of them.
  • False advertising Nov 22, 2019

    By in the moment
    No indication that cost will be involved until you get well into the game. Be truthfull!
  • I bought the solution and feel cheated Jun 4, 2011

    By Antiecm
    I bought the solution and it solved the puzzles, but with junk solves. Take the first tree house. Any fool can solve it for 167 dollars. But go to the Leaderboard section and see that the top people are solving it for 28 dollars. Thats what I wanted to see, how did they solve it so cheap. But after buying the solve, I get a junk solve where anyone can do better. Solving the puzzles is not the issue. Solving them for the leader scores is as I do not believe they can actually be solved for that small amount.
  • Stopped Working Nov 24, 2020

    By Anencephalic
    I have enjoyed this app for years, but now I am running iPadOS 14.2 and whenever I start it, it immediately crashes. Please fix?
  • I want a refund now Jul 20, 2019

    By *ugghg ,mndsihfbeojjhisdbfoin
    I didn’t like this game and I want a refund
  • Boring Apr 4, 2019

    By help connie please
    I got the game with MY MONEY and I have already done all the lessons so it was a WASTE
  • IPhone not the interface to use Jun 18, 2013

    By Laron Von Baron
    Simply frustrating, maybe they should have stuck with the ipad,, the layout crowds out all usable space and unless you have fingers the size of drink stir stick forget this app for your phone really i cant see getting this for my iPad because it needs some work ALSO I am very dubious of apps that have to many 5 star ratings and lots of 1and 2 star ratings and very few 3,4 it is a sure sign of stacking the deck one person said it was the best game they ever played and then gave it a 3 star rating ?????? Sorry guys the truth is a habit with me game is based on fantasy and random solutions not engineered based reality
  • Absolutely Impossible Aug 25, 2011

    By Shell29
    -5 stars. This game is called 'Simple Physics' but the physics engine in this game is for , minus the smile. I can't even get past the second level! Four 50 lb. children could've totally fit on like four of my inventions. And the fact that you have to build stuff for as little money as possible adds a new level of the in- prefix. Btw, who the h*** builds a tree house on the side of the tree, 15 feet from the ground!?!?! I like physics games, and I have like, 9 of them on my iPhone but this is a sorry, worthless, excuse for a physics game. The physics wouldn't even make sense if you were on Jupiter. Free is to expensive for this app.
  • Flawed Physics Sep 17, 2011

    By proxli
    The game was fun, but then it crashed. I suppose the work around is to email myself each solution so the next time it crashes so I can reinstall and the get the 3 stars back. The BIGGER problem is that some constructions work in the sped up mode that do not work in the normal speed mode. ****Don't read further if you don't want to know a solution.*** For example, in the Windy City level make an upside down "W" (ie "M" but slanted ends) four units high at the bottom with a 2x1 triangle on top: fails in normal speed yet works in fast-forward speed. So the engine is flawed.

What’s Groovy

What’s Subpar

Want more reviews? Sign up for free to get all-access!

As well as curated coupons daily to your inbox. Save up to 90% on Apps & Games.

We will never share or sell your data with third parties. You can opt out anytime.

Loading...